The Hittite war-god, in the high tradition of state cult, was Zababa — borrowed in name from the Mesopotamian Zababa of Kish but in older Hattic tradition called Wurunkatte, "King of the Land." He was patron of the Hittite armies, sworn to in royal oaths, named in the treaty-curses by which Hittite kings bound their vassals: "If you break this treaty, may Zababa shatter you with his weapons."
Of his myths the Hittites have left no extended narratives; what they have left is the abundant evidence of his official cult. He stood, with the storm-god and the Sun-Goddess of Arinna, in the principal triad of state deities; he received the spoils of war; his image was carried before the Hittite armies; he was, in short, the divine officer of the Hittite state, and his presence is felt more in royal documents than in mythological tales.
When the sources speak
Dated witnesses for Anatolia. A date marks when the evidence was written down, not when the belief began. The whole timeline
- c. 3400–3000 BCE
- Uruk-period writing and monumental temple economies create the earliest recoverable administrative setting for named divine institutions.
- c. 2900–2350 BCE
- Early Dynastic city-states preserve local cults, hymns, royal inscriptions, and god lists; later copies often transmit older compositions.
- c. 2334–2154 BCE
- The Akkadian Empire expands bilingual and imperial patterns of divine identification without erasing local cult titles.
- c. 2112–2004 BCE
- Ur III administration and scribal schooling standardize many Sumerian literary and liturgical forms.
- c. 2000–1600 BCE
- Old Babylonian schools copy major myths, laments, hymns, debates, and heroic narratives in the form most often used by modern editors.
- c. 1650–1200 BCE
- Hittite and Hurrian archives at Hattusa transmit Anatolian myths, imported Syrian materials, and ritual compositions.
- c. 1400–1190 BCE
- The tablets of Ugarit preserve the Baal Cycle, Kirta, Aqhat, ritual lists, and a dense Late Bronze Age West Semitic pantheon.
- c. 1000–612 BCE
- Neo-Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian empires collect, revise, and politically reinterpret older learned traditions.