Set was the brother of Osiris and Isis, the husband of Nephthys, and the great antagonist of the Osirian myth. He was the god of the desert, of the hot wind, of foreign lands, of disorder and strife; his sacred animal was a strange composite creature — long-snouted, square-eared, forked-tailed — that has no certain modern identification, and is generally called by Egyptologists simply "the Set animal." He was depicted as a man with the head of this animal, or sometimes wholly as the creature itself.
The murder of Osiris and the conflict with Horus (told in their entries) make him the principal villain of Egyptian mythology. But the Egyptian theological position on Set was more complex than simple villainy. He was, on the one hand, the rebel and fratricide; on the other, he was the indispensable defender of the solar barque against the great serpent Apep, who alone among the gods could stand in the prow each night and beat back the chaos-serpent with his spear. Without Set, the sun would not rise. The Egyptians thus held him in a peculiar double esteem — necessary, even revered in some periods (the Hyksos invaders made him their patron, and the Ramesside pharaohs of the Nineteenth and Twentieth Dynasties bore his name in royal protocols: Seti I and Seti II were named for him), but also feared and, in late periods, vilified.
By the Late Period, the negative view came to dominate. The Persian invasions, the Greek and Roman ascendancies, and the increasing identification of foreign rule with Set's domain of foreign lands progressively darkened his mythology, and by the time of Plutarch he was straightforwardly the principle of evil — "the Egyptian Typhon," Plutarch calls him, identifying him with the Greek monster of disorder. His statues were defaced; his name was erased from older inscriptions; his cult, formerly substantial in the eastern Delta and at Ombos in Upper Egypt, dwindled to a few remote outposts. The trajectory by which a god honored as a defender becomes, over centuries, the embodiment of cosmic evil is one of the more illuminating cases in the history of religion.







